|
Computational and Analytical Molecular Evolution Lab at CARB | Nexplorer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People | Publications | Software | Opportunities | Links | Internal | ||
This page is way, way out of date! Please bear with us. We will begin fixing things up early in 2006!
This page is mostly to assemble resources and information for quantitative research in molecular evolution, for other types of computational evolutionary research, and for development of bioinformatics tools. If what you really want are links to specific databases, genome projects, servers, and popular end-user bioinformatics software, use a web search engine, or start with one of these pages:
On page 179 of Darwin's Black Box Michael Behe claims:
He closes the chapter with this ludicrous statement:
"In effect, the theory of Darwinian molecular evolution has not published, and so it should perish"
(Did someone say publish or perish?: The Elusive Scientific Basis of Intelligent Design Theory)
To be honest, I suspect that the extent of detail Behe is demanding would require a combination cutting-edge biochemistry lab and a time machine. How else can science fully recover, for example, every single step in the evolution of the bacterial flagellum that took place billions of years ago?
In any case the claim itself is false since papers do in fact exist that attempt to flesh out the details of the evolution of various biochemical systems and structures. Many such citations are included below.
But that is only part of the story. There are thousands of additional published papers containing solid and detailed evidence of biochemical evolution:
Most of the citations and abstracts below were found using the PubMed MEDLINE search engine and microbiology database. A simple search reveals that there are over 13,000 articles that contain "evolution" as a major subject keyword - hardly the dead silence that Behe proclaims. Granted many of these do not directly address the problem of adaptive complexity in biochemical systems, but many of them do.
Note that I have excluded papers that discuss sequence comparisons being used solely to determine lines of descent. Michael Behe already admits that common descent is reasonable.
Keep in mind this is only a small sampling of citations collected from my own searches, and from the suggestion of others (thanks for those suggestions!)
Last but not least. Please help me find more citations and continue to grow this page - especially if you have a background in biochemistry or microbiology. Thank you.
(major MeSH 1998 Jan-May)